The Art of Transcribing For The Guitar
- Part I
by Richard DeVinck
I wish I had a dollar for every time someone asked me
what exactly it is that I do when I transcribe music: I could quit my
day job and spend more time playing the guitar. The inquirer usually
is someone with little or no musical background, yet it never ceases
to amaze me at how often the question comes from a musician.
Either they are curious as to the actual process of transcribing or
they are just confused between transcribing and other musical terminology
or processes like "arranging" and "transposing".
Let us first deal with terminology: transcribing is the subjective
(i.e. imperfect) process of listening to a musical performance and writing
it down in either standard musical notation or tablature. The transcriber
thus interprets what he hears and relays that information to other musicians
by way of the printed page. It is the goal of the transcriber to educate
- that is, to teach other musicians how to perform the transcribed piece
of music - by way of a universally accepted and understood notation.
Although arranging is similar to transcribing , it differs in
one essential aspect: arranging is the process of setting the music
to predominantly different instrumentation, while transcribing deals
with notating the music of the actual instruments involved in the performance.
Arrangers usually take liberties with harmony, voicings, rhythm and
alternative instrumentation. Transcribers tend to be more true to the
original performance in terms of rhythm, pitch, fingerings, etc.
Transposing is simply writing down or playing music in another
key or register. Hopefully this brief explanation clears up any confusion
or misunderstandings about the terms "transcribing", "arranging", and
"transposing".
The art of transcribing has been around as long as the written word.
Man has written down what others have said for thousands of years. For
the most part, musicians have written down their own compositions. On
occasion, after hearing a performance of music, a musician with good
musical memory might have written down a transcription of that performance
(at least as best as he/she could recall). However, it has only been
during the latter part of the 20th century that music transcriptions
have attained a higher level of accuracy - not to mention popularity.
Publishers have been printing sheet music for hundreds of years. In
regards to classical music, the works are usually taken verbatim from
the original handwritten manuscripts of the composer. If, let's say,
a Bach cello suite differed from edition to edition (publisher to publisher)
it was usually because someone added their own preferred fingerings,
bowings, phrase markings, voicings, etc. - essentially, arranging the
original to fit the musical practices and preferences of the day.
When it came to popular music, publishers usually assumed (rightly or
wrongly) that everyone played piano. Until the latter part of the 20th
century, most popular songs were printed as piano arrangements. I guess
this had more to do with the fact that it was much more economical and
profitable for the publishers to print piano scores than to transcribe
and print every part of the recorded instrumentation. More often than
not, the arrangements were not in the original key of the popular recording,
or used inaccurate harmonies, or just didn't capture the true feel of
the music at hand. If you were a trumpet player in a band, most of your
sheet music (or "charts") was handwritten by the arranger of your band
who would often use a published piano score as the foundation on which
he would compose his own voicings, harmonies, and instrumentation.
When it came to guitar sheet music, just ask anyone old enough to have
lived through the 1960's and 1970's and they will tell you that finding
an accurate printed arrangement of your favorite popular song was nearly
impossible. If you did find the sheet music to a popular rock song,
it was more than likely arranged for piano (an instrument probably not
found in the original recording of the song, anyway) with guitar "frames"
above the piano score. Again, the chords were usually inaccurate or
"simplified" and there was little or no hint as to how to play the harmonies,
that is - no riffs, fingerings, solos, or arpegiated patterns.
This all changed in the early 80's with the advent of periodicals like
Guitar For The Practicing Musician. Its publishers and one or
two other monthly magazines took a gamble: they believed that if they
would make available to the public (mostly teenage boys) note-for-note
transcriptions of guitar-based rock songs, that the public would want
to try and learn to play those songs no matter how complex and detailed
the transcription's notation. They also brought back an old form of
notation which went out of favor hundreds of years ago: tablature.
The gamble paid off and "note-for-note" guitar transcriptions soon became
the hottest sensation in the publishing market.
The note-for-note tablature format soon carried over to music songbooks
of entire records, as well as anthologies. Bass guitar, piano, and even
drums were added to the list of instruments which were assigned note-for-note
tablature songbooks. These more accurate transcriptions have proven
to be a great educational tool and have resulted in many students teaching
themselves how to play their instrument.
One could attribute the success of note-for-note transcriptions to two
things: the first being the favored notation of tablature. Tablature
is a more "accessible" or easily-read music notation. It is more of
a direct representation of the instrument at hand. Guitar tablature
has six lines, representing the six strings on the instrument. The numbers
on the lines represent the frets to be fingered. (Refer to Fig. A below.)
Although rhythm is usually notated above or below the six-line staff,
it is usually memorized aurally by the student from the recording. For
the most part, those who learn from tablature usually have memorized
every nuance of the recording, so rhythm does not pose much of a problem.
In contrast, standard music notation relies much more on interpretation
and association in order to be understood.
Secondly, the very fact that no form of popular music has been left
untouched by transcribers may be another reason for the success of note-for-note
tablature. Blues, bluegrass, classic rock, heavy metal, industrial rock,
country western, Celtic, folk - to mention a few - they have all been
covered by numerous guitar transcriptions. Once more, anyone with a
computer can access thousands of these transcriptions for free on the
Internet with a simple search.
The note-for-note transcription has proven to be an important instructional
tool and has improved the reading skills of many musicians. Most transcriptions
are in guitar tablature format since most of the market centers on guitarists.
One of the greatest assets of these very accurate interpretations of
music recordings is their ability to convey, in written form, almost
every nuance of a musician's playing and technique.
Part II of this discussion (to appear in the next issue of the Carmel
Classic Guitar Society Journal) will focus on the process and the art
of transcribing.
Mr. DeVinck is a classically trained guitarist and board member of
the Carmel Classic Guitar Society who has transcribed guitar songbooks
for publishers Hal Leonard, Warner Bros., and Creative Concepts.